|
Post by Alex Karavaltchev on Oct 7, 2013 22:33:24 GMT
I feel that the Safford v. Redding case should have ended with the school getting in trouble for strip searching a 13 year old. This event would not be acceptable by today's standards and should have not been accepted even if the incident happened 7 years ago. This forced strip search should have only been preformed with consent of the child's parents instead of the school nurse. Also, the child was not posing an immediate threat within the school, which means that there was no reason for the search to happen in the first place. The only thing that could have been in possession of the child were prescription pills. Overall, the defendant should have lost the case because the whole situation was not handed in an appropriate way.
|
|